Journal: North American Spine Society Journal
Article Title: Can artificial intelligence in spine imaging affect current practice? Practical developments and their clinical status
doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100621
Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative examples of Siemens DeepResolve DLR (left) versus conventional MR imaging (right) on sagittal (A) cervical spine T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequences and (B) lumbar spine T1-weighted turbo spin echo sequences. In both cases, DeepResolve produced images with twice the resolution in the plane of acquisition (3 × 3 × 3 mm versus 6 × 6 × 3 mm in [A] and 4 × 4 × 4 mm versus 9 × 9 × 4 mm in [B]) with similar acquisition times (0:44 minutes vs. 0:38 minutes in [A] and 1:09 minuted versus 0:57 minutes in [B]). Of note, there was a 2 year gap between images for each patient owing to the introduction of DLR.
Article Snippet: Comparative examples of Siemens DeepResolve DLR (left) versus conventional MR imaging (right) on sagittal (A) cervical spine T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequences and (B) lumbar spine T1-weighted turbo spin echo sequences.
Techniques: Imaging, Produced